Top 5 this week

Storms and Heavy Rain Kill 14 Across Afghanistan as Deadly Weather Intensifies

Legendary Italian Designer Valentino Garavani Dies at 93, Ending a Golden Era of Haute Couture

Ex-ISI Chief Faiz Hameed Sentenced to 14 Years After 15-Month Court Martial

Share Now:

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Ex ISI Chief Faiz Hameed Sentenced to 14 Years After 15 Month Court Martial

Charges include political activities, misuse of authority, violation of Official Secrets Act

What Happened?

Former Director General of ISI, Lt. Gen (retd) Faiz Hameed, has been sentenced to 14 years in rigorous imprisonment following a 15-month-long Field General Court Martial (FGCM). The verdict was issued after the court found him guilty on four serious charges:

  1. Engaging in political activities
  2. Violating the Official Secrets Act, endangering state safety and interest
  3. Misuse of authority and government resources
  4. Causing wrongful loss to individuals

Where and When Did the Trial Take Place?

The court martial proceedings began on August 12, 2024, under the provisions of the Pakistan Army Act, and continued for 15 months. The 14-year sentence was officially promulgated on December 11, 2025.

Who Oversaw the Proceedings?

The trial was conducted by a Field General Court Martial, with oversight from the Inspectorate of Court Proceedings and Records (ICPR) to ensure all procedural and legal standards were rigorously followed.

Faiz Hameed was represented by a defense team of his choice, and all military legal protocols were strictly adhered to.

Why Does It Matter?

This high-profile conviction underscores accountability within the military, reinforcing that no individual, regardless of rank, is above the law.

Authorities also noted that investigations into Faiz Hameed’s alleged political agitation and collusion with political elements are ongoing and will be addressed separately from the court martial verdict.

How Was the Trial Conducted?

  • The court reviewed evidence, testimonies, and documentation over 15 months.
  • The accused was provided full legal rights, including defense representation.
  • Transparency was maintained through oversight by ICPR.
  • The verdict confirmed guilt on all charges, leading to the 14-year rigorous imprisonment sentence.

Key Questions Emerging

  • What legal avenues exist for appeal? The convict retains the right to challenge the verdict in the relevant judicial forum.
  • Why was the trial extended for 15 months? Due to meticulous examination of evidence and ensuring procedural compliance.
  • Who else might be implicated in the ongoing political investigations? Authorities are reviewing possible collusion with political elements separately.

How will this sentence affect civil-military relations in Pakistan? Analysts suggest it may reinforce legal accountability while impacting perceptions of military neutrality.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *