K-P governor, PRCS board accused of spending relief funds on parties, hometown projects
PPP accused of diverting K-P flood relief money for political purposes
Money allocated for Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa’s flood victims was allegedly used for political and personal purposes by Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) members, according to accusations presented in the Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Wednesday.
A petition filed by the president of the Pakistan International Human Rights Organisation (K-P chapter) challenges the recent appointments made to the Pakistan Red Crescent Society (PRCS) provincial chapter and claims that humanitarian resources were systematically misused.
PRCS appointments challenged for political motives
The petitioner’s lawyer argued that K-P Governor Faisal Karim Kundi recently appointed a new PRCS chairperson and formed a managing board, despite the original structure being established in 2022.
He alleged that these appointments were made to “accommodate PPP members and loyalists,” turning the humanitarian body into a political tool.
Flood funds allegedly diverted to hometown projects
According to the petition, disaster relief funds were rerouted through a non-tendered contract to Aziz Khan Constructions for development projects in Azam Killa and Kotka Doulat Khan villages linked to PRCS Vice Chairperson Farzand Wazir.
The petitioner claims the contract was awarded without competitive bidding, violating procurement rules.
Emergency tents moved to non-affected regions
Another allegation states that 500 emergency tents were unlawfully transported from Red Crescent warehouses to Mandhra village in Dera Ismail Khan—the governor’s home constituency.
The area was not flood-affected, raising concerns over deliberate misuse of aid meant for devastated regions such as Swat, Buner, Mansehra, and Dir Lower.
Relief items from other provinces allegedly misused
The petition further alleges that relief goods donated by the governments of Sindh, Balochistan, and international partners were diverted to PPP supporters instead of genuine flood victims.
Former PRCS officials reportedly provided testimonies supporting these claims.
Non-transparent procurement flagged
The petition highlights a Rs7.7 million food package contract issued without advertisement or competitive bidding to what was described as a “politically favoured supplier,” violating PRCS procurement policy.
Additionally, Rs3 million was reportedly spent on an Iftar dinner at the Governor’s House.
Justice Ijaz Anwar sharply questioned this expenditure, remarking:
“Were they distributing sweets to all of Pakistan?”
Court seeks response from parties
A division bench comprising Justice Ijaz Anwar and Justice Waqar Ahmad heard the arguments and issued notices to all respondents, seeking replies before the next hearing.
The petition requests:
- Suspension of PRCS provincial appointments
- Restriction on the chairman and managing board from functioning
- Appointment of an interim management to oversee operations
Oversight of State Power
The allegations, if proven true, raise serious questions about the Pakistan Peoples Party’s governance standards and moral credibility. Critics argue that a party claiming to champion public welfare cannot justify the diversion of humanitarian aid meant for flood victims. They say that using relief funds for political patronage, hometown development projects, and lavish gatherings reflects a deeper culture of irresponsibility and entitlement within the party ranks. Observers also note that the PPP leadership must answer why transparent procurement rules were ignored and why aid intended for devastated communities was allegedly redirected for political advantage. The case is now widely seen as a test of the party’s commitment to accountability, transparency, and ethical governance.