Chief Justice Yahya Afridi leads bench; hearing adjourned to August 19 for legal arguments.
ISLAMABAD – The Supreme Court of Pakistan has issued formal notices to the Punjab government over bail appeals filed by the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder in connection with the May 9 unrest cases, directing the provincial prosecution department to prepare its legal arguments for the next hearing.
The matter came up before a three-member bench headed by Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, which also included Justices [Insert Names if Available]. The bench adjourned proceedings until August 19, giving both sides time to present their positions on the legal questions involved.
Court’s Directions
During Tuesday’s hearing, Chief Justice Afridi made it clear that the court would refrain from making any observations or preliminary findings that might prejudice either party. He emphasized that the upcoming session would focus on specific legal questions, and directed counsels from both the defense and prosecution to come fully prepared to assist the court.
Background on the May 9 Cases
The cases stem from the violent protests and riots that erupted across the country on May 9, 2023, following the arrest of the PTI founder. Government buildings, military installations, and public property were targeted during the unrest, prompting a nationwide crackdown on the party’s leadership and workers.
Dozens of cases were registered against senior PTI leaders, including the founder, under charges ranging from vandalism and arson to terrorism-related offences. Many of these cases were lodged in Punjab, which became a focal point of the post-May 9 legal proceedings.
The PTI founder has consistently denied the charges, calling them politically motivated and part of an effort to silence opposition. Multiple bail applications have been filed in various courts, with some granted and others rejected, eventually bringing parts of the legal battle to the Supreme Court.
Next Steps
The Supreme Court’s notice to the Punjab government signals a more structured hearing process, with legal questions likely to revolve around the applicability of certain charges, procedural compliance, and whether the evidence meets the threshold for continued detention.
Legal experts note that the outcome of these appeals could have significant political implications, particularly as Pakistan moves closer to the next election cycle.