Public gatherings, rallies, and weapons banned under new orders

Fresh Restrictions Signal Rising Security Concerns

Authorities have extended Section 144 in Rawalpindi and Quetta, tightening public restrictions amid growing law and order concerns. The move reflects heightened security fears and increasing political tension in both cities.

Officials say the decision aims to prevent unrest and maintain public safety. Residents now face continued limits on movement and public activity.

Quetta Under Month-Long Curbs

The Balochistan government has extended Section 144 in Quetta for one full month. The restrictions will remain in effect until January 31.

According to the Home Department, the order bans the display and use of weapons. It also restricts motorcycle pillion riding, except for women and children. Authorities have prohibited tinted vehicle windows and the movement of unregistered motorcycles.

Public gatherings of five or more people are not allowed. Processions and rallies remain banned. Face coverings, including masks and mufflers, are also prohibited in public spaces.

Rawalpindi Faces Another Seven Days of Restrictions

In Rawalpindi, the district administration has extended Section 144 for an additional seven days. The restrictions will remain in place until January 7.

During this period, all public meetings, rallies, and processions are banned. Authorities have also prohibited the use of loudspeakers and the public display of weapons.

Officials say the extension is necessary to prevent any disruption to law and order.

Strict Legal Action Warning Issued

The government has warned of strict consequences for violations. Officials say they will take action under Section 188 of the Pakistan Penal Code and other relevant laws.

Law enforcement agencies have been instructed to enforce the orders strictly. Authorities say there will be no leniency for those who defy the restrictions.

Political Climate Adds to Tension

The extension comes amid heightened political activity and street mobilisation fears. Officials believe restrictions are needed to prevent clashes and unrest.

Critics argue that repeated extensions strain public life and limit civic space. Supporters say the measures are necessary to avoid chaos during sensitive times.

Analysis: Security vs Public Freedom

The continued use of Section 144 highlights a familiar dilemma in Pakistan. Authorities prioritise security during uncertain times. However, prolonged restrictions often increase public frustration.

As political tensions remain unresolved, further extensions cannot be ruled out. The coming weeks will test whether these measures ease instability or deepen public unease.